MyDD :: Rasmussen Daily Tracking 3-7 Clinton 49% Obama 43%

Rasmussen Daily Tracking 3-7 Clinton 49% Obama 43%

by Safe at Home, Fri Mar 07, 2008 at 11:25:26 AM EST

The Rasmussen Daily Tracking poll for the Democratic Nomination shows a 1 point gain over the previous day for Clinton. I guess Sen. Clinton has some Mo right now. Any comments.Click Here for Link

Tags: 2008 Presidental (all tags)

Permalink :: 24 Comments :: Post a Comment

Re: Rasmussen Daily Tracking 3-7 Clinton 49% Obama (none / 0)

Lot's of MO, nowhere near enough delegates. The people have spoken; it's time to unite the party.

Obama's lead is bigger today than it was Monday.

by vermontprog on Fri Mar 07, 2008 at 11:29:27 AM EST

Re: Rasmussen Daily Tracking 3-7 Clinton 49% Obama (none / 0)

I haven't spoken. I'm in Indiana. Our primary is May 6th.

-----------
Blog: http://fitnessnerd.blogspot.com/

by FitnessNerd on Fri Mar 07, 2008 at 11:59:26 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Rasmussen Daily Tracking (none / 0)

A 1point gain from the previous day is an indicator of a lot of MO?

by mecarr on Fri Mar 07, 2008 at 11:32:48 AM EST

Re: Rasmussen Daily Tracking (none / 0)

On 2-28 the poll was Obama 49%, Clinton 40%. A 15 point swing in 8 days isnt too shabby.

by Safe at Home on Fri Mar 07, 2008 at 12:14:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Miss (none / 0)

Clinton's gonna get beat badly come Mississippi.

According to an ARG poll released today:
Obama: 58%
Clinton 34%

http://www.americanresearchgroup.com/

by mecarr on Fri Mar 07, 2008 at 11:35:40 AM EST

Re: Miss (none / 0)

Any Wyoming polls?

by mainelib on Fri Mar 07, 2008 at 11:36:12 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Miss (none / 0)

yeah, they asked all 14 voters, who said they were apt to vote for Obama.

by Cycloptichorn on Fri Mar 07, 2008 at 11:41:23 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Miss (none / 0)

Haha, I wish it was that easy ;-)

by marcotom on Fri Mar 07, 2008 at 11:47:25 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Miss (none / 0)

LOL. Amusing comment, admittedly.

Even John McCain lusts after teh engels.

by sricki on Fri Mar 07, 2008 at 11:52:26 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Miss (none / 0)

I hear she was campaigning in MS yesterday. is she still there today?

Wonder why she's not in WY.

Obama's in WY today

by poserM on Fri Mar 07, 2008 at 11:49:33 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re (2.00 / 1)

Many of the people have not spoken and oh its nearly impossible for Obama to reach 2024 if Hillary now has the 'mo and clobbers him in the remaining big contests so she ain't going anywhere

by rossinatl on Fri Mar 07, 2008 at 11:36:54 AM EST

Re: Re (none / 0)

Operative word from your post:

'if' Hillary clobbers him.

She's 'clobbered' him in exactly one state - AR. None of her other wins have been by more then 20 points.

by Cycloptichorn on Fri Mar 07, 2008 at 11:42:20 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Re (none / 0)

I thought RI was a state. Did i miss something.

david

by giusd on Fri Mar 07, 2008 at 11:46:47 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Re (none / 0)

No. But RI is a small state. We don't count small states. Only CA, MA, . . .

by poserM on Fri Mar 07, 2008 at 11:48:25 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Re (none / 0)

Clinton won RI 58-40.

That's not a 20 point gap, per my comment above. So I didn't count it.

by Cycloptichorn on Fri Mar 07, 2008 at 12:09:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: national polling (none / 0)

...will tighten back up again after Obama wins Mississippi (and, in all likelihood, Wyoming).

The best move for him is chipping away at her lead in Pennsylvania while simultaneously downplaying expectations there, and trickling out new superdelegate endorsements every day. A five point loss there would actually be a decent finish for him, from a delegate standpoint, particularly if it limits her momentum going on to Indiana and North Carolina. If he can limit her to winning Pennsylvania, Kentucky, West Virginia and Puerto Rico(and maybe Guam), and then split the re-vote(winning Michigan, losing Florida), then they finish the primary season with Obama having won 32 states, plus DC, and Clinton having won 18, plus Puerto Rico. He would have the edge in pledged delegates and popular vote as well, and might even have more superdelegate endorsements than her at that point, perhaps with only a couple hundred uncommitted SDs and UADs left.

by megaplayboy on Fri Mar 07, 2008 at 11:57:14 AM EST

Re: national polling (none / 0)

It's amazing how much North Carolina has been forgotten in the mix of things. This is a huge state with 115 delegates at stake. Nobody should expect Obama to win Pennsylvania, but he stands a good shot at NC.

by mecarr on Fri Mar 07, 2008 at 12:00:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: national polling (none / 0)

I think that's a fair analysis.

How about though, if Clinton wins Pennsylvania by 10 instead of 5, wins Indiana instead of Obama winning it, and wins the Michigan re-vote. What then?

by markjay on Fri Mar 07, 2008 at 12:07:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: national polling (none / 0)

Not a doubt in my mind about her winning Indiana
Kentucky West Virginia and PA. Also think depending on resources she has a shot in NC.

by coolofthenight on Fri Mar 07, 2008 at 12:23:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Rasmussen Daily Tracking 3-7 Clinton 49% Obama (none / 0)

Yea, Obama should step aside because he has more pledged deleates, more popular vote, won more states, and most likely has more money. That makes sense only to the senseless.

by mecarr on Fri Mar 07, 2008 at 11:57:55 AM EST

Re: Rasmussen Daily Tracking 3-7 Clinton 49% (none / 0)

I'm hearing from Obama followers who are having buyers remorse - due to the media concealing info about Obama while bashing Hillary.

Hillary/Obama08

by annefrank on Fri Mar 07, 2008 at 12:01:10 PM EST

Re: Rasmussen Daily Tracking 3-7 Clinton 49% (none / 0)

I doubt that's true.

by Cycloptichorn on Fri Mar 07, 2008 at 12:10:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Rasmussen Daily Tracking 3-7 Clinton 49% (none / 0)

That's what they've told me.

Hillary/Obama08

by annefrank on Fri Mar 07, 2008 at 12:23:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]